Conference Reviewer Guide
Reviewers should refer to this page when reviewing conference paper submissions. It is the responsibility of each reviewer to ensure that the review process is carried out in a timely, fair and consistent manner. As an acknowledged expert in your relevant field, you are expected to provide an unbiased and critical assessment of the submission. As a reviewer, it is important that you remain objective in your critical appraisal. Your comments should be professional and courteous and should help the author to improve their paper and present their research as clearly and concisely as possible. 

Review Material
Short papers should present future research directions and ongoing work with visionary, innovative ideas; accepted short papers will be presented in a separate session at the conference and will be included in the conference proceedings. Submitted papers must not have been published elsewhere and must not be currently under review by another conference or journal. Submission implies the willingness of at least one of the authors to register and present the paper. All submitted papers will be peer-reviewed by at least 2~3 independent experts in the field, following a double-blind process.